THE BUSINESS/RESEARCH SIDE
The first few links were relevant to our research assignments. First, we developed a design blog and the link following helped us understand why we were to do this rather than just mindlessly following an assignment. Many designers blog because it allows them to broaden their experience and helps market their design services. In short, blogging is the design equivalent of marketing that other arts hold. You need to interact, find a niche, show your value, be organized, and have good content.
Next, we researched further in relation to our design blogs and the content that would be on it. The link given with this research assignment elaborated the importance of research and how to utilize that research. It’s good to research other services to have an imitative start-up, but one should not stray away from an imitative business approach. The market for services is constantly evolving and in order to maintain relevancy, one must be willing to step out of the norm and do the unknown/radical.
THE ARTISTIC SIDE
In our first creation assignment we were to create a final product that was connotative. I think Jerry Ulesmann’s work was the link provided because his works are the perfect example of connotative images. His images are suggestive enough to provoke a feeling in the viewer, but are abstract enough to allow the viewer to participate and dissect the image themselves. His examples helped me in trying to shape my final product to do the same thing.
In our next creation assignment, we made logos and links about Paul Rand and Michael Bierut were provided. Paul Rand was one of the most prominent graphic designers who has created countless amounts of corporate logos. His advice in attaining successes with these logos emphasized the importance of simplicity, but being identifiable. However, the logo should be a symbol of identity and not a tool used in an attempt to sell something to someone.
With my own research, I found a paper written by Paul Rand himself on his views with design. It was like he had a checklist of knowing whether a logo was quality or not. He really emphasized the simplicity of a logo to make sure it identifies and doesn’t sell. His checklist of the effectiveness of a good logo states that it depends on “distinctiveness, visibility, usability, memorability, universality, durability, timelessness.”
A collection of his works really puts his advice into images and served as a great example for what we should attempt to create as our logo.
Going further on Paul Rand’s advice of logo’s being a symbol of identity, Michael Bierut also says some similar things. Designing is more than just creating an image or a drawing, but it is carving an identity. Paul Rand’s way of defining an effective logo really seems like it shaped the standard of good design.
Lastly, we were to create a book jacket. Chip Kidd’s TED Talk humorously discusses his successes with designs with a variety of books, including Jurassic Park and 1Q84. Great design is essential in creating a great seller since the book’s sleeve will be the first impression. You can really tie back his advice to the previous design artists that these links detailed. When designing something, even a book sleeve, you aren’t trying to give away the entire contents of the story. Keep it connotative enough that it will grabber a reader or viewer’s attention to want to search through it further.
It seems that, based on the links I was provided and my own research, it is universally accepted that simplicity and identity are the most important factors in design. That simplicity and identity can be developed through expressing information and research through connotative imagery.



